The National Endowment for the Humanities (NEH) has just recognized the work of not one, but two, Lehigh faculty members. Patrick Connolly and Roslyn Weiss, both faculty in the department of philosophy, have been awarded Summer Stipend grants from the NEH, marking the first time in 60 years that two faculty from the same university have been funded concurrently for their respective research.
Summer Stipends are highly competitive; just 9% of applicants received funding over the past five years. The awards support continuous full-time work on a humanities project for a period of two consecutive months. NEH funds may support recipients’ compensation, travel, and other costs related to the proposed scholarly research.
“Support by the NEH is recognition of the high level and quality of research and scholarship that takes place in the College of Arts and Sciences at Lehigh,” said Robert Flowers, Herbert J. and Ann L. Siegel Dean. “Patrick and Roslyn are to be congratulated since these awards are important confirmation that the research they pursue is making a significant impact on their respective areas of scholarly interest.”
A Discourse of Miracles
More than three centuries after his death, John Locke’s formative contributions to both philosophy and political theory remain the subject of intense study and debate. Unfortunately, a full appreciation of Locke’s thoughts about philosophy and religion is hampered by the absence of editions of Locke’s theological works that are both accurate and widely accessible, says Connolly, assistant professor of philosophy. His ongoing project seeks to address this problem.
More than three centuries after his death, John Locke’s formative contributions to both philosophy and political theory remain the subject of intense study and debate. Unfortunately, a full appreciation of Locke’s thoughts about philosophy and religion is hampered by the absence of editions of Locke’s theological works that are both accurate and widely accessible, says Connolly, assistant professor of philosophy. His ongoing project seeks to address this problem. Connolly is co-editing a volume that will, for the first time, establish an authoritative text of one of Locke’s most significant theological works, The Discourse of Miracles, and will also shed new light on make many of his writings on religion available in print.
“I’m interested in Locke and the intersection of theology, philosophy and natural sciences during that period. Authors at the time didn’t see those as distinct from one another. They saw them as interrelated, but for Locke it was about issues such as knowledge and belief and what kinds of beliefs we should form on the basis of what kinds of evidence. And there’s a scientific definition of what it takes to be a miracle. It has to be an exception to a law of nature. The Discourse of Miracles is one of the places Locke talks about what laws of nature are and how he thinks they might work. He addresses God’s law and what the laws of nature might be. It’s something I’ve been interested in since my dissertation, so the opportunity to work on it in this way is really appealing.”
Together with Victor Nuovo at Middlebury College, Connolly is working to compile and edit a publication, titled A Discourse of Miracles and Other Theological Writings, which will be part of the Clarendon Edition of the Works of John Locke. The volumehighlights a crucial component of Locke’s greater understanding and defense of Christianity.
Understanding Locke’s writings will provide an even richer understanding of his theological thought, its context, and its development over time, Connolly says. Additionally, the Discourse sheds light on Locke’s epistemological views on such topics as belief, evidence, and testimony, and his scientific method. This means that the Discourse is an essential text for understanding Locke’s views in his more famous Essay Concerning Human Understanding and Letters Concerning Toleration, he adds.
The NEH support allows Connolly to travel to the Bodleian Libraries at the University of Oxford, where Locke’s manuscript remains are housed. Connolly says he will also spend time writing the edition’s introduction and first chapters, then working with Nuovo to complete the work by the end of this year.
The Republic
The Republic is Plato’s most famous and widely read dialogue. Over 10 books, the dialogue explores two central questions. The first question is “what is justice?” The other is “what is the best political institution and what is the place of the philosopher in it?”In Book Four of Plato’s Republic his main character Socrates presents a novel definition of justice, one widely regarded by scholars as the official Platonic teaching on the nature of justice. Justice, Socrates asserts, is the harmonious cooperation of the parts of the city with one another, and of the parts of the soul with one another, with each part doing “its own” and not usurping the role of the other parts. In particular, he says, in a just city and soul the parts best suited to ruling and the parts best suited to being ruled scrupulously avoid switching places. Weiss contends, against the commonly held view, that it is not the definition in Book 4 that reveals the true meaning of justice in the Republic. Rather, the proper understanding of justice emerges in the series of conversations in Book One between Socrates and three successive speakers: Cephalus, Polemarchus, and Thrasymachus.
The first book of The Republic is completely different in style from the rest of the books. In Book 1, Socrates speaks with people and asks them questions. They answer him and he challenges their answers.
“The rest of The Republic has Socrates speaking continuously with an occasional challenge or question,” says Weiss, Clara H. Stewardson Professor of philosophy. “He does all the talking, whereas he listens to others in the first book and works with their views. We have an interesting shift between Book One and the rest of the books and people have been puzzled by that. Some scholars think the first book was at one time its own standalone dialogue.
The interesting thing is that the definition of justice that Socrates proposes in Book Four is entirely new, one that he never proposed earlier and that he doesn’t talk about anywhere else in his corpus. Even in the Republic itself after Book Four it kind of dies out. What’s missing in this new definition is what most people associate with justice, namely, how you act toward other people; yet with this new definition Socrates brings it internally. It’s now a matter of how the parts of your soul interact with one another rather than how you treat other people; it’s a matter of how the classes in the city interact with one another rather than how the city treats other cities or its own people. Because of how striking and innovative this new definition is, readers assume it must be, despite its short shelf life, Plato’s true definition.
The Republic contains many unsavory proposals with regard to the supposedly “ideal” city it designs – repression and censorship— and Weiss is skeptical about how strongly Plato meant to be advocating the society that Socrates envisions. Weiss sees in Book One a different approach to justice, something we’re much more familiar with, that speaks to how you treat other people.
“From my point of view, what Socrates says about justice in the first book of the Republic is supposed to forewarn us against the novel definition in Book Four. Book One is important because without it you are drawn into believing that Book Four’s definition is the right one, but, forearmed with Book One, you are prepared to say that can’t be right. And once you toss out one thing in the Republic, namely, the new definition of justice, you’re more inclined to question other things. Of course, the fascinating question is, if Plato didn’t mean for Socrates’ proposals to be taken as serious recommendations, why did he have Socrates propose them?”
For Weiss, the project is a culmination of years of research into the Republic. The NEH support allows her to examine the secondary literature on Socrates’ exchanges with Cephalus and Polemarchus, two characters in Book One, and to write Chapters two and three of a book project she hopes to publish soon. Weiss expects that by the end of the summer she will have completed a first draft of these two chapters.
“I believe my book will be of value and interest to scholars and students of ancient philosophy and ethics, to classicists, and to humanists more broadly,” she says. “I hope it will encourage further exploration of the riches Book One contains. That Socrates’ question of what justice is remains a critical one at this time is perhaps confirmed by Merriam-Webster’s report that in 2018 “justice” was the word looked up most frequently. The matters of what constitutes a good life for human beings, and whether and how justice contributes to such a life, continue to be among the most pressing concerns of the humanities.”
